Strategy
Strategy Lab
Construct a strategy, model it across scenarios, then send it for approval — never straight to settlement.
New Strategy
Assumptions are explicit and stored with the strategy
Projected value — expected scenario
$164.00K
Strategy Memory
Select up to three to compare
Multi-Strategy Comparison
Assumptions differ between strategies and are listed explicitly
| Metric | Growth Strategy Alpha | Treasury Defense |
|---|---|---|
| Capital | $100.00K | $250.00K |
| Expected Scenario | +11.40% | +5.10% |
| Conservative Scenario | +6.20% | +4.20% |
| Stress Scenario | −14.80% | −2.40% |
| Volatility | 12.6% | 3.1% |
| Liquidity | 62% | 94% |
| Max Drawdown | −18.20% | −3.60% |
| Confidence | 72% | 88% |
| Horizon | 5 years | 18 months |
| Thesis | Compound through diversified growth exposure while protecting 180 days of operating liquidity. | Maximise protected liquidity and short-duration yield ahead of a capital deployment window. |
Soltuition recommendation
Treasury Defense carries the highest confidence and protects liquidity through the current deployment window. Growth Strategy Alpha remains the better compounding vehicle once the digital-asset concentration breach is resolved. Ecosystem Reinvestment should stay modelled only until DCSI revenue verification improves.
Growth Strategy Alpha
Compound through diversified growth exposure while protecting 180 days of operating liquidity.
Expected
+11.40%
Stress
−14.80%
Treasury Defense
Maximise protected liquidity and short-duration yield ahead of a capital deployment window.
Expected
+5.10%
Stress
−2.40%